Page Loading ...

NYT Reports AG Barr Undersold The Mueller Report's Damage To Donald Trump | The 11th Hour | MSNBC

Watch the video

click to begin

Youtube

♪ >>> GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN FROM
>>> GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN FROM OUR NBC NEWS HEAD QUARTERS IN
OUR NBC NEWS HEAD QUARTERS IN NEW YORK.
NEW YORK. I'M NICOLE WALLACE IN FOR BRIAN
I'M NICOLE WALLACE IN FOR BRIAN WILLIAMS.
WILLIAMS. DAY 804 OF THE TRUMP
DAY 804 OF THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND THERE'S
ADMINISTRATION AND THERE'S BREAKING NEWS FROM THE "NEW YORK
BREAKING NEWS FROM THE "NEW YORK TIMES."
TIMES." STUNNING REPORT THE FIRST WINDOW
STUNNING REPORT THE FIRST WINDOW INTO HOW SOME OF MUELLER'S
INTO HOW SOME OF MUELLER'S INVESTIGATORS FEEL ABOUT
INVESTIGATORS FEEL ABOUT ATTORNEY BARR'S DESCRIPTION OF
ATTORNEY BARR'S DESCRIPTION OF THEIR 22-MONTH ENDEAVOR SAYS
THEIR 22-MONTH ENDEAVOR SAYS SOME OF MUELLER'S INVESTIGATORS
SOME OF MUELLER'S INVESTIGATORS CLAIM THEIR RESULTS ARE MORE
CLAIM THEIR RESULTS ARE MORE DAMAGING TO THE PRESIDENT THAN
DAMAGING TO THE PRESIDENT THAN WHAT'S BEEN REVEALED THIS FAR.
WHAT'S BEEN REVEALED THIS FAR. ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF TONIGHT'S
ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF TONIGHT'S PIECE JOINS US IN A MINUTE.
PIECE JOINS US IN A MINUTE. HE AND HIS COLLEAGUES REPORT
HE AND HIS COLLEAGUES REPORT SOME OF THE INVESTIGATORS QUOTE
SOME OF THE INVESTIGATORS QUOTE HAVE TOLD ASOEGSZIATES THAT IF
HAVE TOLD ASOEGSZIATES THAT IF ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR
ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR FAILED TO ADEQUATELY PORTRAY
FAILED TO ADEQUATELY PORTRAY THEIR FIND GSZ AND MORE
THEIR FIND GSZ AND MORE TROUBLING MR. BARR INDICATED.
TROUBLING MR. BARR INDICATED. THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S
THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATORS HAVE ALREADY
INVESTIGATORS HAVE ALREADY WRITTEN MULTIPLE SUMRIES OF THE
WRITTEN MULTIPLE SUMRIES OF THE REPORT AND SOME TEAM MEMBERS
REPORT AND SOME TEAM MEMBERS BELIEVE MR. BARR SHOULD HAVE
BELIEVE MR. BARR SHOULD HAVE INCLUDED SOME OF THEIR MATERIAL
INCLUDED SOME OF THEIR MATERIAL IN THE LETTER HE WROTE MARCH
IN THE LETTER HE WROTE MARCH 24th.
24th. THE OFFICIALS AND OTHERS
THE OFFICIALS AND OTHERS INTERVIEWED DECLINED TO FLUSH
INTERVIEWED DECLINED TO FLUSH OUT WHY SOME OF THE SPECIAL
OUT WHY SOME OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S FINDINGS WERE VIEWED
COUNSEL'S FINDINGS WERE VIEWED AS MORE DAMAGING TO THE PTDS
AS MORE DAMAGING TO THE PTDS PRESIDENT THAN MR. BARR
PRESIDENT THAN MR. BARR EXPLAINED.
EXPLAINED. MR. BARR AND HIS ADVISORS HAVE
MR. BARR AND HIS ADVISORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR OWN FRUSTRATIONS
EXPRESSED THEIR OWN FRUSTRATIONS ABOUT MR. MUELLER AND HIS TEAM.
ABOUT MR. MUELLER AND HIS TEAM. MR. BARR AND OTHER JUSTICE
MR. BARR AND OTHER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS BELIEVE THE
DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS BELIEVE THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATORS
SPECIAL COUNSEL'S INVESTIGATORS FELL SHORT OF THEIR TASK BY
FELL SHORT OF THEIR TASK BY DECLINING TO DECIDE WHETHER
DECLINING TO DECIDE WHETHER MR. TRUMP IT ILLEGALLY HAD AN
MR. TRUMP IT ILLEGALLY HAD AN INQUIRY.
INQUIRY. AND THEY WANTED TO OBTAIN IT THE
AND THEY WANTED TO OBTAIN IT THE FULL, UNEDITED MUELLER REPORTED,
FULL, UNEDITED MUELLER REPORTED, INCLUDING ALL UNDERLYING
INCLUDING ALL UNDERLYING DOCUMENTS.
DOCUMENTS. MR. BARR INTENDS TO RELEASE A
MR. BARR INTENDS TO RELEASE A REDACTED VERSION OF THE MUELLER
REDACTED VERSION OF THE MUELLER REPORT LATER THIS MONTH.
REPORT LATER THIS MONTH. ONE OF THE "NEW YORK TIMES"
ONE OF THE "NEW YORK TIMES" REPORTER WHO BROKE THIS STORY,
REPORTER WHO BROKE THIS STORY, PULITZER PRIZE WINNING WRITER
PULITZER PRIZE WINNING WRITER FOR THE "NEW YORK TIMES."
FOR THE "NEW YORK TIMES." AND JOYCE VANCE AND JEREMY BASH,
AND JOYCE VANCE AND JEREMY BASH, FORMER KEEF OF STAFF AT THE CIA
FORMER KEEF OF STAFF AT THE CIA AND PENTAGON.
AND PENTAGON. >> WHAT WE'RE REPORTING IS HOW
>> WHAT WE'RE REPORTING IS HOW THERE'S SOME DISSATISFACTION
THERE'S SOME DISSATISFACTION AMONG THE MUELLER TEAM ABOUT THE
AMONG THE MUELLER TEAM ABOUT THE FACT THAT BARR GOT A CHANCE TO
FACT THAT BARR GOT A CHANCE TO REALLY CAST THE DYE ON HOW THE
REALLY CAST THE DYE ON HOW THE NARRATIVE WAS GOING TO BE FORMED
NARRATIVE WAS GOING TO BE FORMED ABOUT THEIR INVESTIGATION.
ABOUT THEIR INVESTIGATION. THEY FELT THAT WHEN THE RESULTS
THEY FELT THAT WHEN THE RESULTS WERE GOING TO BE OUT THERE, WHEN
WERE GOING TO BE OUT THERE, WHEN THERE WAS A PRONOUNCEMENT FROM
THERE WAS A PRONOUNCEMENT FROM THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LIKE BARR
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LIKE BARR DID RIGHT AFTER THE REPORT 48
DID RIGHT AFTER THE REPORT 48 HOURS, THAT THERE WOULD HAVE
HOURS, THAT THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN SOME DESCRIPTION OF WHAT
BEEN SOME DESCRIPTION OF WHAT THEY FOUND AND THAT BY ALLOWING
THEY FOUND AND THAT BY ALLOWING BARR -- BY BARR GOING FIRST AND
BARR -- BY BARR GOING FIRST AND LAYING THIS OUT T IT HAS SORT OF
LAYING THIS OUT T IT HAS SORT OF CEMENTED THE WAY THAT PUBLIC MAY
CEMENTED THE WAY THAT PUBLIC MAY LOOK AT WHAT THEY FOUND AND THAT
LOOK AT WHAT THEY FOUND AND THAT THEY REALLY WANT AS MUCH OF IT
THEY REALLY WANT AS MUCH OF IT OUT THERE AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE
OUT THERE AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE THEY THINK THAT BARR HAS MADE IT
THEY THINK THAT BARR HAS MADE IT APPEAR BETTER THAN WHAT IT
APPEAR BETTER THAN WHAT IT REALLY IS.
REALLY IS. REMEMBER, WHEN BARR COMES OUT
REMEMBER, WHEN BARR COMES OUT AND SAYS -- ESSENTIALLY CLEARS
AND SAYS -- ESSENTIALLY CLEARS THE PRESIDENT OF ANY WRONG
THE PRESIDENT OF ANY WRONG DOING, THERE IS NOT A LOT OF
DOING, THERE IS NOT A LOT OF DETAIL IN THERE ABOUT WHAT THE
DETAIL IN THERE ABOUT WHAT THE INVESTIGATORS FOUND
INVESTIGATORS FOUND >> WHAT I WANT TO ASK IS WHAT
>> WHAT I WANT TO ASK IS WHAT WAS BARR THINKING?
WAS BARR THINKING? BUT YOU DETAIL SOME OF WHAT THE
BUT YOU DETAIL SOME OF WHAT THE VIEW IS FROM THE ATTORNEY
VIEW IS FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S VIEWPOINT.
GENERAL'S VIEWPOINT. TAKE US THROUGH THAT.
TAKE US THROUGH THAT. >> Caller: THERE'S FRUSTRATION
>> Caller: THERE'S FRUSTRATION WITH MUELLER.
WITH MUELLER. THERE'S A FEELING THAT MUELLER
THERE'S A FEELING THAT MUELLER WAS THERE TO DO TWO THINGS.
WAS THERE TO DO TWO THINGS. INVESTIGATE WHETHER CRIMES
INVESTIGATE WHETHER CRIMES HAPPENED AND PROVIDE A
HAPPENED AND PROVIDE A CONFIDENTIAL REPORT TO THE
CONFIDENTIAL REPORT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ATTORNEY GENERAL. THAT'S TRR IT.
THAT'S TRR IT. THAT'S ALL THE REGULATIONS
THAT'S ALL THE REGULATIONS CALLED FOR AND SAY.
CALLED FOR AND SAY. BUT ON THE QUESTION OF
BUT ON THE QUESTION OF OBSTRUCTION, MUELLER DID NOT DO
OBSTRUCTION, MUELLER DID NOT DO THAT.
THAT. HE DID NOT COME TO A
HE DID NOT COME TO A DETERMINATION AND THAT IS
DETERMINATION AND THAT IS PERPLEXING, OBVIOUSLY TO THE
PERPLEXING, OBVIOUSLY TO THE PUBLIC THAT DOESN'T UNDERSTAND
PUBLIC THAT DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHY MUELLER DIDN'T GET THERE.
WHY MUELLER DIDN'T GET THERE. BUT ALSO TO BARR BECAUSE THIS
BUT ALSO TO BARR BECAUSE THIS HAS LEFT BARR THROUGHOUT ALONE
HAS LEFT BARR THROUGHOUT ALONE TO MAKE THE CALL ABOUT WHETHER
TO MAKE THE CALL ABOUT WHETHER THE PRESIDENT BROKE THE LAW AND
THE PRESIDENT BROKE THE LAW AND HE DOESN'T HAVE THE TOP COVER OF
HE DOESN'T HAVE THE TOP COVER OF THE INVESTIGATOR, THE SPECIAL
THE INVESTIGATOR, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WHO WAS SUPPOSED BE
COUNSEL WHO WAS SUPPOSED BE THERE FOLLOW THE FACTS IN A
THERE FOLLOW THE FACTS IN A POLITICS FREE WAY.
POLITICS FREE WAY. THAT PERSON HAS TALK AN PASS ON
THAT PERSON HAS TALK AN PASS ON WHETHER CRIMINALITY HAPPEN AND
WHETHER CRIMINALITY HAPPEN AND BARR IS A PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTEE
BARR IS A PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTEE AND WAS PUT THERE JUST A FEW
AND WAS PUT THERE JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO BY THE PRESIDENT.
MONTHS AGO BY THE PRESIDENT. A SENSE THAT MAYBE IT THE SYSTEM
A SENSE THAT MAYBE IT THE SYSTEM HERE DID NOT WORK AS IT WAS
HERE DID NOT WORK AS IT WAS SUPPOSED TO.
SUPPOSED TO. >> THE BOOM THAT'S BEEN LOWERED
>> THE BOOM THAT'S BEEN LOWERED ON WASHINGTON IN YOUR REPORT IS
ON WASHINGTON IN YOUR REPORT IS THAT MUELLER'S INVESTIGATORS WHO
THAT MUELLER'S INVESTIGATORS WHO HAVE BEEN MUTE FOR 22 MONTHS.
HAVE BEEN MUTE FOR 22 MONTHS. THERE HAS BEEN LITTLE KNOWN OF
THERE HAS BEEN LITTLE KNOWN OF HOW THEY VIEW ANYTHING WERE
HOW THEY VIEW ANYTHING WERE EXASPERATED OR SOMETHING BY WHAT
EXASPERATED OR SOMETHING BY WHAT THEY SAW.
THEY SAW. LET ME SHOW YOU WHAT THE
LET ME SHOW YOU WHAT THE PRESIDENT HAS SAID.
PRESIDENT HAS SAID. STARTING ON MARCH 24th.
STARTING ON MARCH 24th. LET ME PLAY THAT.
LET ME PLAY THAT. >> IT'S COMPLETE EXONERATION.
>> IT'S COMPLETE EXONERATION. NO CAN COLLUSION.
NO CAN COLLUSION. NO OBSTRUCTION.
NO OBSTRUCTION. >> THE MUELLER EREPORT WAS
>> THE MUELLER EREPORT WAS GREAT.
GREAT. IT CAN COULD NOT HAVE BEEN
IT CAN COULD NOT HAVE BEEN BETTER.
BETTER. I WILL SAY THIS OUR NEW ATTORNEY
I WILL SAY THIS OUR NEW ATTORNEY GENERAL, BILL BARR, IS A GREAT
GENERAL, BILL BARR, IS A GREAT GENTLEMAN.
GENTLEMAN. >> BEAUTIFUL CONCLUSION.
>> BEAUTIFUL CONCLUSION. I HAVEN'T SEEN IT THE REPORT.
I HAVEN'T SEEN IT THE REPORT. BEAUTIFUL CONCLUSION.
BEAUTIFUL CONCLUSION. >> AFTER THREE YEARS OF LIES AND
>> AFTER THREE YEARS OF LIES AND SMEARS AND SLANDER, THE RUSSIA
SMEARS AND SLANDER, THE RUSSIA HOAX IS FINALLY DEAD.
HOAX IS FINALLY DEAD. >> TOTALLY FINISHED.
>> TOTALLY FINISHED. NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION.
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION. >> I'M GUESSING THAT THE MUELLER
>> I'M GUESSING THAT THE MUELLER INVESTIGATORS DON'T LIVE IN
INVESTIGATORS DON'T LIVE IN CAVES AND THEY SAW SOME OF THAT.
CAVES AND THEY SAW SOME OF THAT. ANY SENSE IT WAS THE PRESIDENT'S
ANY SENSE IT WAS THE PRESIDENT'S EXONERATION VICTORY LAP THAT GOT
EXONERATION VICTORY LAP THAT GOT TO THEM?
TO THEM? >> NO SENSE OF WHAT ACTUALLY
>> NO SENSE OF WHAT ACTUALLY INCITED THEM TO DO THIS BESIDES
INCITED THEM TO DO THIS BESIDES BARR'S LETTER WHICH THEY FELT
BARR'S LETTER WHICH THEY FELT WAS TOO MEAGER AND TOO MUCH OF
WAS TOO MEAGER AND TOO MUCH OF PUTTING HIS HAND DOWN ON WHAT HE
PUTTING HIS HAND DOWN ON WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS IMPORTANT WITHOUT
THOUGHT WAS IMPORTANT WITHOUT SHOWING WHAT THEY DID.
SHOWING WHAT THEY DID. BUT YOU CAN'T NOT UNDERSTAND
BUT YOU CAN'T NOT UNDERSTAND WHERE THEY'RE COMING FROM IF
WHERE THEY'RE COMING FROM IF THEY SEE THE PRESIDENT OUT THERE
THEY SEE THE PRESIDENT OUT THERE SAYING THINGS LIKE THAT, TALKING
SAYING THINGS LIKE THAT, TALKING ABOUT THE BEAUTIFUL MUELLER
ABOUT THE BEAUTIFUL MUELLER REPORT AND SUCH AND SAYING WELL,
REPORT AND SUCH AND SAYING WELL, MAYBE IT'S NOT AS GREAT AS THE
MAYBE IT'S NOT AS GREAT AS THE PUBLIC IS MAKING IT OUT TO BE.
PUBLIC IS MAKING IT OUT TO BE. MAYBE THERE ARE THINGS THERE
MAYBE THERE ARE THINGS THERE THAT ARE PROBLEMATIC THAT
THAT ARE PROBLEMATIC THAT CONGRESS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT.
CONGRESS SHOULD KNOW ABOUT. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WOULD SAY
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WOULD SAY THAT'S NOT REALLY FALLING UNDER
THAT'S NOT REALLY FALLING UNDER REGULATIONS.
REGULATIONS. AND WE'VER DETERMINED NO CRIMES
AND WE'VER DETERMINED NO CRIMES HAPPENED.
HAPPENED. AND THERE'S ONLY ONE REAL
AND THERE'S ONLY ONE REAL ANSWERER WHICH IS WE NEED SEE
ANSWERER WHICH IS WE NEED SEE THE REPORT.
THE REPORT. WE NEED TO SEE HOW BIG THE DELTA
WE NEED TO SEE HOW BIG THE DELTA IS BETWEEN WHAT BARR SAID
IS BETWEEN WHAT BARR SAID PUBLICLY, THE IMPRESSION THE
PUBLICLY, THE IMPRESSION THE PUBLIC HAD AND WHAT MUELLER'S
PUBLIC HAD AND WHAT MUELLER'S FINDINGS ARE.
FINDINGS ARE. >> YOU SAID ON THE 4:00 TODAY
>> YOU SAID ON THE 4:00 TODAY YOU WERE SURE THAT THE MUELLER
YOU WERE SURE THAT THE MUELLER TEAM, AT THE END OF AN
TEAM, AT THE END OF AN INVESTIGATION, BECAUSE AT THE
INVESTIGATION, BECAUSE AT THE END OF ANY INVESTIGATION,
END OF ANY INVESTIGATION, SUMRIES ARE CREATED.
SUMRIES ARE CREATED. THAT SOMETHING EXISTED, THAT
THAT SOMETHING EXISTED, THAT WOULD HAVE ALLOWED ATTORNEY
WOULD HAVE ALLOWED ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR TO INCLUDE MORE
GENERAL BARR TO INCLUDE MORE THAN CENSUS FRAGMENTS.
THAN CENSUS FRAGMENTS. THERE IS STILL ALL THAT WE HAVE
THERE IS STILL ALL THAT WE HAVE SEEN FROM THE MUELLER REPORT ARE
SEEN FROM THE MUELLER REPORT ARE SENTENCE FRAGMENTS.
SENTENCE FRAGMENTS. I IMAGINE HOW THOSE
I IMAGINE HOW THOSE INVESTIGATORS WHO KEPT THEIR
INVESTIGATORS WHO KEPT THEIR MOUTH SHUT HAVE SUMMERED OVER
MOUTH SHUT HAVE SUMMERED OVER THE PAST WEEK OR SO.
THE PAST WEEK OR SO. >> IMAGINE THIS LARGE TEAM FROM
>> IMAGINE THIS LARGE TEAM FROM ANALYSTS TO FORENSIC
ANALYSTS TO FORENSIC ACCOUNTANTS, ALL REMAINING
ACCOUNTANTS, ALL REMAINING SILENT FOR TWO YEARS.
SILENT FOR TWO YEARS. NOT SO MUCH AS A RAISED EYEBROW
NOT SO MUCH AS A RAISED EYEBROW FINDING ANYTHING ONE WAY OR
FINDING ANYTHING ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
ANOTHER. WHILE THEY WERE BEING
WHILE THEY WERE BEING UNDERMINED, ATTACKED PERSONALLY
UNDERMINED, ATTACKED PERSONALLY AND PROFESSIONALLY.
AND PROFESSIONALLY. NOW WE SEE FOR THE FIRST TIME
NOW WE SEE FOR THE FIRST TIME DISMADE OVER HOW THIS NARRATIVE
DISMADE OVER HOW THIS NARRATIVE IS BEING ALLOWED TO HAPPEN AND
IS BEING ALLOWED TO HAPPEN AND PLAY OUT AND IT CLEARLY
PLAY OUT AND IT CLEARLY CONFLICTS WITH WHAT THEY KNOW.
CONFLICTS WITH WHAT THEY KNOW. AND WHAT WE'RE BEING SET UP FOR
AND WHAT WE'RE BEING SET UP FOR HERE IS EITHER A POLITICAL
HERE IS EITHER A POLITICAL DECISION OR A DISAGREEMENT ON
DECISION OR A DISAGREEMENT ON WHAT MUELLER'S MISSION WAS.
WHAT MUELLER'S MISSION WAS. WE'RE HEARING THAT THE ATTORNEY
WE'RE HEARING THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS ALLEGEDLY DISMADE
GENERAL IS ALLEGEDLY DISMADE THAT MUELLER DIDN'T MAKE THE
THAT MUELLER DIDN'T MAKE THE CALL, RIGHT?
CALL, RIGHT? BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO FIND OUT,
BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO FIND OUT, PERHAPS, THAT MUELLER'S
PERHAPS, THAT MUELLER'S INTENTION ALL ALONG WAS TO HAVE
INTENTION ALL ALONG WAS TO HAVE CONGRESS MAKE THE CALL, THEN
CONGRESS MAKE THE CALL, THEN WE'VE HAD THEM FOLLOW THE RULES
WE'VE HAD THEM FOLLOW THE RULES AND ASSUMING THE ATTORNEY
AND ASSUMING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WOULD PLAY BY THE SAME
GENERAL WOULD PLAY BY THE SAME RULED AND HE'S GOT A DIFFERENT
RULED AND HE'S GOT A DIFFERENT SET OF RULES.
SET OF RULES. >> YOU HAVE CAUTIONED US TO GIVE
>> YOU HAVE CAUTIONED US TO GIVE ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR THE BENEFIT OF THE IT DOUBT.
BENEFIT OF THE IT DOUBT. IT WOULD STHEEM MUELLER
IT WOULD STHEEM MUELLER INVESTIGATORS WHO EXPRESS
INVESTIGATORS WHO EXPRESS FRUSTRATIONS IN THIS REPORT AT
FRUSTRATIONS IN THIS REPORT AT LEAST COULDN'T DO THAT FOR ANY
LEAST COULDN'T DO THAT FOR ANY LONGER.
LONGER. WHAT'S YOUR SENSE NOW ON THE DYE
WHAT'S YOUR SENSE NOW ON THE DYE BEING CAST ON NOT JUST THE
BEING CAST ON NOT JUST THE FINDINGS BUT WILLIAM BARR'S
FINDINGS BUT WILLIAM BARR'S LEADERSHIP AT IT THIS INCREDIBLY
LEADERSHIP AT IT THIS INCREDIBLY FRAUGHT MOMENT?
FRAUGHT MOMENT? >> IT'S A DIFFICULT POINT AND I
>> IT'S A DIFFICULT POINT AND I WAS MAYBE THE OUT LIAR ON THIS
WAS MAYBE THE OUT LIAR ON THIS BECAUSE DURING THE CONFORMATION
BECAUSE DURING THE CONFORMATION PROCEEDINGS, I WROTE A PIECE FOR
PROCEEDINGS, I WROTE A PIECE FOR SLATE AND MADE THE POINT THAT
SLATE AND MADE THE POINT THAT BECAUSE BARR HAD COME IN UNDER
BECAUSE BARR HAD COME IN UNDER CLOUD OF THIS MEMO HE WROTE
CLOUD OF THIS MEMO HE WROTE WHERE HE SEEMED TO PRO PREJUDGE
WHERE HE SEEMED TO PRO PREJUDGE THE ISSUE OF OBSTRUCTION SAYING
THE ISSUE OF OBSTRUCTION SAYING THE PRESIDENT COULDN'T COMMIT
THE PRESIDENT COULDN'T COMMIT OBSTRUCTION, THAT IT WOULD BE
OBSTRUCTION, THAT IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO HAVE CONFLICTS IN
DIFFICULT TO HAVE CONFLICTS IN DECISIONS HE MADE DOWN THE ROAD
DECISIONS HE MADE DOWN THE ROAD AND NOW WE'RE SEEING THE PROBLEM
AND NOW WE'RE SEEING THE PROBLEM COME THEM TO ROOS.
COME THEM TO ROOS. WE DON'T KNOW IF HE'S MAKING
WE DON'T KNOW IF HE'S MAKING PRINCIPALED DECISIONS.
PRINCIPALED DECISIONS. BUT BECAUSE HE SEEMED TO HAVE
BUT BECAUSE HE SEEMED TO HAVE PREJUDGED THE ISSUES IN AN
PREJUDGED THE ISSUES IN AN EFFORT TO GET THE JOB IN THE
EFFORT TO GET THE JOB IN THE FIRST PLACE T WILL BE DIFFICULT
FIRST PLACE T WILL BE DIFFICULT TO HAVE ANY APPRECIATION FOR
TO HAVE ANY APPRECIATION FOR WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE
WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE UNLESS THE MUELLER REPORT LAY
UNLESS THE MUELLER REPORT LAY BEAR AND WE'RE GIVEN THE
BEAR AND WE'RE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO JUDGE IT FOR
OPPORTUNITY TO JUDGE IT FOR OURSELVES.
OURSELVES. >> TAKE US THROUGH.
>> TAKE US THROUGH. WE'VE BEEN TALKING AROUND AND
WE'VE BEEN TALKING AROUND AND ABOUT THE MUELLER REPORT.
ABOUT THE MUELLER REPORT. WHAT WAS THE OBSTRUCTION REPORT
WHAT WAS THE OBSTRUCTION REPORT LIKELY TO LOOK LIKE?
LIKELY TO LOOK LIKE? AND I SUPPOSE IN A RUSSIAN
AND I SUPPOSE IN A RUSSIAN SECTION AS WELL.
SECTION AS WELL. WHAT KIND OF DAMAGING
WHAT KIND OF DAMAGING INFORMATION ARE WE LIKELY TO SEE
INFORMATION ARE WE LIKELY TO SEE EVEN IF IT CAME SHORT OF BEING
EVEN IF IT CAME SHORT OF BEING SOMETHING IT COULD CHARGE IN A
SOMETHING IT COULD CHARGE IN A CRIMINAL WAY AND BEING SERIOUS
CRIMINAL WAY AND BEING SERIOUS ENOUGH THEY WROTE IN DO NOT
ENOUGH THEY WROTE IN DO NOT EXONERATE.
EXONERATE. >> I THINK ON THE CONSPIRACY
>> I THINK ON THE CONSPIRACY SIDE THE PREDICATE IS ALL THE IT
SIDE THE PREDICATE IS ALL THE IT EFRLT TO ATTACK OUR LECTION AND
EFRLT TO ATTACK OUR LECTION AND ALL THE EFFORT TO NOT OFFER
ALL THE EFFORT TO NOT OFFER THEIR INSISTENCE AND ENGAGE THE
THEIR INSISTENCE AND ENGAGE THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN BUT TO NOTIFY THE
TRUMP CAMPAIGN BUT TO NOTIFY THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN THAT THEY WERE
TRUMP CAMPAIGN THAT THEY WERE INTERFERING THE ELECTION AND
INTERFERING THE ELECTION AND DISCUSS WHAT THEY WOULD GT IN
DISCUSS WHAT THEY WOULD GT IN RETURN, WHAT REWARD THEY WOULD
RETURN, WHAT REWARD THEY WOULD REAP IN TERMS OF RELIEF AND
REAP IN TERMS OF RELIEF AND OTHER SANCTION RELIEF WE SAW THE
OTHER SANCTION RELIEF WE SAW THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION REWARD THEM
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION REWARD THEM WITH.
WITH. IT'S NOT ONLY WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN
IT'S NOT ONLY WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN PUBLIC AND THE WHITE HOUSE
PUBLIC AND THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL SAT FOR TENS OF HOURS
COUNSEL SAT FOR TENS OF HOURS WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S
WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE DETAILING WHAT THE WHITE
OFFICE DETAILING WHAT THE WHITE HOUSE, THE PRESIDENT DID TO TRY
HOUSE, THE PRESIDENT DID TO TRY UNDERMINE THE MUELLER
UNDERMINE THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION AND HIS TEAM.
INVESTIGATION AND HIS TEAM. I THUNK WE'RE GOING TO SEE A
I THUNK WE'RE GOING TO SEE A HEAP OF EVIDENCE THAT IS REALLY
HEAP OF EVIDENCE THAT IS REALLY IT DAMMING ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S
IT DAMMING ABOUT THE PRESIDENT'S CONDUCT.
CONDUCT. IT'S GOING TO APPEAR SHAMEFUL,
IT'S GOING TO APPEAR SHAMEFUL, POTENTIALLY UNETHICAL.
POTENTIALLY UNETHICAL. I THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE
I THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE OBVIOUSLY THE EYE OF THE
OBVIOUSLY THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER.
BEHOLDER. MUELLER SAID NO.
MUELLER SAID NO. AND BILL BARR, HIS SUMMARY
AND BILL BARR, HIS SUMMARY YIELDED THIS INEVITABLE RESULT
YIELDED THIS INEVITABLE RESULT WHERE YOU'RE GO DOING SEE A LOT
Donald Trump Talks Up Nonexistent Health Care Plan And Border Shutdown | The 11th Hour | MSNBC Representative Adam Schiff: New Report On Mueller Findings 'Concerning' | The Last Word | MSNBC Democrats Flex Subpoena Power: We Demand Full Mueller Report | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC First-Ever Leaks Originating From The Robert Mueller Team | All In | MSNBC Trump Says He 'Would Not Be Inclined' To Release Taxes, Despite Dem's Req. To IRS | Hardball | MSNBC 4 Cell Phones, Lap Top, External Hard Drive, Thumb Drive And Zero Swim Suits | Deadline | MSNBC After Mueller Report, Trump Lies About Budget Cuts: A Closer Look Rep. Schiff on CNN: Not Prepared to Give Barr Benefit of the Doubt Tucker to Mexican official: Why aren't you stopping migrants? Lawrence's Last Word: Candidates' Tax Returns | The Last Word | MSNBC